Aquaponics Digest - Sat 02/19/00




Message   1: Re: Lost Post.
             from "Steve" 

Message   2: garbled email!!
             from "Steve" 

Message   3: Re: garbled email!!
             from S & S Aqua Farm 

Message   4: Re: Lost Post.
             from "TGTX" 

Message   5: History of Irrigation
             from "TGTX" 

Message   6: Re: History of Irrigation
             from "TGTX" 

Message   7: Re: UV mysteries
             from Marcy 

Message   8: Re: History of Irrigation
             from Marcy and Marc 

Message   9: Re: History of Irrigation
             from "TGTX" 

Message  10: Re: History of Irrigation
             from Marcy and Marc 

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 1                                                           |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: Lost Post.
From:    "Steve" 
Date:    Sat, 19 Feb 2000 01:48:58 -0600

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0029_01BF7A7B.7CD0FBA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks Ted,

I'll check into this.

Also do me a favor. Paula says my messages come in garbled. Are you able =
to read this w/o a bunch of "crap" in it?

Thanks.......Steve
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: TGTX=20
  To: aquaponics@townsqr.com=20
  Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 7:19 PM
  Subject: Re: Lost Post.

    One of my main questions was, "Does anyone know of a strip or test =
apparatus that can check potassium levels?  Reason being is that I want =
to start adding potassium "sulphate" (I think, I don't have my notes =
right now.) to my fish tanks for the      tomatoes. (Anyone can jump in =
on this.)=20
    =20
    Sorry to be such a pest........Steve =20

    Steve, you can check out Gempler's Catalog which offers various test =
kits for nutrients in the field. Page 270 to 275.  There is a Potassium =
K+ selective meter for about 230 bucks, there is an NPK kit with 50 =
tests for about 20 bucks, etc.  Check out www.gemplers.com.

    Good Luck.

    Ted=20

------=_NextPart_000_0029_01BF7A7B.7CD0FBA0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








Thanks Ted,
 
I'll check into this.
 
Also do me a favor. Paula says my = messages come in=20 garbled. Are you able to read this w/o a bunch of "crap" in = it?
 
Thanks.......Steve
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 TGTX
To: aquaponics@townsqr.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, = 2000 7:19=20 PM
Subject: Re: Lost Post.

One of my main questions was, "Does = anyone know=20 of a strip or test apparatus that can check potassium = levels? =20 Reason being is that I want to start adding potassium = "sulphate" (I=20 think, I don't have my notes right now.) to my fish tanks for=20 the      = tomatoes. (Anyone can jump = in on=20 this.) 
 
Sorry to be such a=20 pest........Steve  
 
Steve, you can check out Gempler's Catalog = which=20 offers various test kits for nutrients in the field. Page 270 to = 275. =20 There is a Potassium K+ selective meter for about 230 bucks, there = is an NPK=20 kit with 50 tests for about 20 bucks, etc.  Check out www.gemplers.com.
 
Good Luck.
 
Ted 
------=_NextPart_000_0029_01BF7A7B.7CD0FBA0-- .------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------. | Message 2 | '------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------' Subject: garbled email!! From: "Steve" Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 01:55:54 -0600 Hi Paula, Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. I reset something. See if this works. The previous emails tonight will probably be about the same, but let me know if this is better. HOPE SO!! Thanks for your "Patience of Gold". Steve .------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------. | Message 3 | '------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------' Subject: Re: garbled email!! From: S & S Aqua Farm Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 08:27:35 -0600 At 01:55 AM 02/19/2000 -0600, Steve wrote: >Hi Paula, > >Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. > >I reset something. See if this works. The previous emails tonight will >probably be about the same, but let me know if this is better. HOPE SO!! > >Thanks for your "Patience of Gold". Steve - this is great!! Whatever you set, keep it that way. Paula .------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------. | Message 4 | '------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------' Subject: Re: Lost Post. From: "TGTX" Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 10:23:03 -0600 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01BF7AC3.4DC48780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Looks O.K. to me Steve, but my email software is Microsoft Outlook = Express, if that means anything. =20 I guess I am just too lazy or something to keep up with all the = differences in software, so I really don't understand all I know about = the various ways and means of the computer lexicon, although I recently = took a course in basic HTML for website design, which was helpful. So = you can teach old dogs new tricks, I guess. I just got around to = throwing away an old stereo with an 8 track tape deck in it!! =20 Apparently, sometimes when I send links to the group straight out of my = Internet browser, I have to take an extra step to send that only in = plain text, because the default is for my browser to send it with the = HTML format. Paula reminded me to always do that and I try, but = sometimes I forget in my haste to send off a link. HTML puts extra = gobble-dee-gook into Paula's archive that she has to clean up before it = goes to Jim Sealy's archive pages. Ted Also do me a favor. Paula says my messages come in garbled. Are you = able to read this w/o a bunch of "crap" in it? Thanks.......Steve ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01BF7AC3.4DC48780 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Looks O.K. to me Steve, but my email software is = Microsoft=20 Outlook Express, if that means anything. 
I guess I am just too lazy or something to keep up = with all=20 the differences in software, so I really don't understand all I know = about the=20 various ways and means of the computer lexicon, although I recently took = a=20 course in basic HTML for website design, which was helpful.  So you = can=20 teach old dogs new tricks, I guess.  I just got around to throwing = away an=20 old stereo with an 8 track tape deck in it!!
 
Apparently, sometimes when I send links to the group = straight=20 out of my Internet browser, I have to take an extra step to send that = only in=20 plain text, because the default is for my browser to send it with the = HTML=20 format.  Paula reminded me to always do that and I try, but = sometimes I=20 forget in my haste to send off a link.  HTML puts extra = gobble-dee-gook=20 into Paula's archive that she has to clean up before it goes to Jim = Sealy's=20 archive pages.
 
Ted
Also do me a favor. Paula says my = messages come=20 in garbled. Are you able to read this w/o a bunch of "crap" in=20 it?
 
Thanks.......Steve
------=_NextPart_000_0008_01BF7AC3.4DC48780-- .------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------. | Message 5 | '------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------' Subject: History of Irrigation From: "TGTX" Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 11:19:28 -0600 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0028_01BF7ACB.2F966B40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable According to the 1999 Irrigation Survey in the Jan/Feb 2000 issue of = Irrigation Journal,=20 6,459,000 acres were irrigated in Texas alone. (62,967,484 acres in the = U.S.A. altogether). Sandra Postel's book "Pillar of Sand: Can the Irrigation Miracle Last" = claims that innovative irrigation technologies and strategies can = alleviate hunger and environmental stress at the same time and that we = can protect river and vital ecosystems evan as we aim to produce enough = food for a projected 8 billion people on this third rock from the sun by = the year 2030. =20 I noted in the Texas data from that survey that 4,050,000 acres of the = 6,459,000 were irrigated by sprinkler systems, which have an approximate = annual efficiency of 78%, whereas only 64,000 acres were in Surface = Drip-Trickle or Subsurface Drip-Trickle irrigation, (other wise known as = microirrigation) which has about a 90% or so annual efficiency rating. = Being a cheerleader for change and an advocate of greater efficiency = with respect to resource management and feeding those folks in 2030, I = would like to focus on this vis a vis aquaponics. Since, in aquaponics, we are irrigating our crops..or perhaps = "fertigating" might be a better word, and since Michael in his earlier = brought back this stirring feeling I have had to go and see the = miraculous and magnificent irrigated fields of Israel, (Israel has = become one of the top fruit producers for European markets, I have = heard) I thought the group might be interested in, or at least = entertained by, a history of microirrigation in the open fields...It = might spawn discussions on how we can integrate large aquaculture = systems with large open field crop systems by "fertigating" with = aquaculture water periodically or continuously. The University of = Arizona Environmental Research Laboratory has done some studies along = these lines. I have some of those papers lying around here somewhere. =20 Here are some interesting quotes from the article "Drops of Life in the = History of Irrigation" written by Dr. Terry A. Howell in that same issue = of the Irrigation Journal, (see http:/www.irrigationjournal.com): (Dr. Howell is a Research Leader and a Supervisory Agricultural Engineer = with the USDA-Agricultural Research Service (ARS) in Bushland, TX.) "Microirrigation, an entirely new irrigation application technology = evolved in the 1960s and 1970s, although some documented concepts of it = date back to 1917. As plastic materials became widely used in = agriculture following WWII, an Israeli engineer working in England named = Dr. Symcha Blass developed the technology to irrigate greenhouse plants. = In the 1950s, he took this technology back to the Negev desert in = Israel to produce crops even with highly saline waters. A San Diego = County Farm Advisor in California, C. Don Gustafson, and a San Diego = sprinkler manufacturer, Bruce Brown, observed Blass' work in Israel and = returned to apply it to avocadoes in Southern California in the late = 1960s. Brown formed the Drip-Eze Company. This application technology = was called drip, because of the water dripped from fixed emitters, or = trickle because of smaller streams from microtubes." =20 "The row crop, or vegetable side of drip/trickle irrigation is often = traced to Norm Smith who was working with farmers in New York with new = plastic products that had become available. Later when Smith moved to = Rutgers University, he began a more agressive promotion for this = technology. Soon, Dick Chapin formed Watermatics which began = manufacturing small diameter plastic tubes and longer thinned walled = pipes mad from thin plastic sheets. Soon, bi-wall drip tubes were = available that permitted longer lateral lines with acceptable flow = variations along the lines. Bernarr J. Hall, another San Diego Farm = advisor who worked with Gustafson, further expanded the Southern = California drip/trickle work on vegetables." "In 1973, many Americans attended the first International Drip = Irrigation Congress in Tel Aviv, Israel. The second congress was = immediately planned for 1974 in San Diego, CA......" =20 "Drip/trickle irrigation was ideally suited to widely spaced plant crops = like orchards or vineyards with the more traditional fixed emitters on = small diameter polyethylene laterals. The drip/trickle tube products = (now called tapes) were well suited to haigh valued vegetable crops, = and even large-scale agricultural crops like sugarcane. But the heart = of any sucessful drip/trickle system was the water filtration system. = Screen filters were adapted alon with media filters to reduce emitter = and tape clogging from fine particles" (Are you taking notes fish = farmers?- TGTX) "In some cases, water treatment with chlorine and/or acids was necessary = to reduce lime formation and biological clogging. Drip/trickle = irrigation soon invaded the commercial, home, and garden irrigation = markets together with the greenhouse industry, where Dr. Blass started = his work" (Full circle, I like it.- TGTX)=20 "The drip/trickle concept was applied to low-volume sprays by James = Roberts, a San Marcos, CA citrus grower. These devices and other = low-volume sprayers continued to evolve. Soon it became nearly = impossible to classify all the differing types of low-volume = applicators. Now, we simply "lump" all these low-volume applicators = whether drip, trickle, microsprays, spitters, etc. under the single name = "microirrigation"" "Although overall irrigated land area has not changed substantially = during the past two decades, rather dramatic changes have occurred in = on-farm irrigation methods. Surface irrigation remains vitally = important to U.S. agriculture, but it declined from 62% of irrigated = lands in 1979 to 50% in 1998. During this time center pivots increased = by 72% and microirrigaton by almost 600%. Irrigation has evolved into a = high-tech industry filled with people on the verge of the latest = technological advances. It is without a doubt that those within the = industry will continue to move it forward in the new millenium" The article also refers readers to a complete history of irrigation = found in the book "Water and the Land" by Robert M. Morgan. =20 Ted ------=_NextPart_000_0028_01BF7ACB.2F966B40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
According to the 1999 Irrigation Survey in=20 the Jan/Feb 2000 issue of Irrigation Journal,
6,459,000 acres were irrigated in Texas alone.  = (62,967,484 acres in the U.S.A. altogether).
 
Sandra Postel's book "Pillar of Sand: Can the = Irrigation=20 Miracle Last" claims that innovative irrigation technologies and = strategies can=20 alleviate hunger and environmental stress at the same time and that we = can=20 protect river and vital ecosystems evan as we aim to produce enough food = for a=20 projected 8 billion people on this third rock from the sun by the year=20 2030. 
 
I noted in the Texas data from that survey that = 4,050,000=20 acres of the 6,459,000 were irrigated by sprinkler systems, which have = an=20 approximate annual efficiency of 78%, whereas only 64,000 acres were in = Surface=20 Drip-Trickle or Subsurface Drip-Trickle irrigation, (other wise known as = microirrigation) which has about a 90% or so annual efficiency = rating. =20 Being a cheerleader for change  and an advocate of greater = efficiency with=20 respect to resource management and feeding those folks in 2030,  I = would=20 like to focus on this vis a vis aquaponics.
 
Since, in aquaponics, we are irrigating our = crops..or perhaps=20 "fertigating" might be a better word, and since Michael in his earlier = brought=20 back this stirring feeling I have had to go and see the = miraculous and=20 magnificent irrigated fields of Israel, (Israel has become one of the = top fruit=20 producers for European markets, I have heard)  I thought the = group=20 might be interested in, or at least entertained by, a history of=20 microirrigation in the open fields...It might spawn discussions on how = we can=20 integrate large aquaculture systems with large open field crop systems = by=20 "fertigating" with aquaculture water periodically or continuously.  = The=20 University of Arizona Environmental Research Laboratory has done some = studies=20 along these lines.  I have some of those papers lying around here=20 somewhere.
 
Here are some interesting quotes from the article = "Drops of=20 Life in the History of Irrigation" written by Dr. Terry A. Howell in = that same=20 issue of the Irrigation Journal, (see=20 http:/www.irrigationjournal.com):
(Dr. Howell is a Research Leader and a Supervisory=20 Agricultural Engineer with the USDA-Agricultural Research Service (ARS) = in=20 Bushland, TX.)
 
"Microirrigation, an entirely new irrigation = application=20 technology evolved in the 1960s and 1970s, although some documented = concepts of=20 it date back to 1917.  As plastic materials became widely used in=20 agriculture following WWII, an Israeli engineer working in England named = Dr.=20 Symcha Blass developed the technology to irrigate greenhouse = plants.  In=20 the 1950s, he took this technology back to the Negev desert in Israel to = produce=20 crops even with highly saline waters.  A San Diego County Farm = Advisor in=20 California, C. Don Gustafson, and a San Diego sprinkler manufacturer, = Bruce=20 Brown, observed Blass' work in Israel and returned to apply it to = avocadoes in=20 Southern California in the late 1960s.  Brown formed the Drip-Eze=20 Company.  This application technology was called drip, because = of the=20 water dripped from fixed emitters, or trickle because of smaller streams = from=20 microtubes." 
 
"The row crop, or vegetable side of drip/trickle = irrigation is=20 often traced to Norm Smith who was working with farmers in New York with = new=20 plastic products that had become available.  Later when Smith = moved to=20 Rutgers University, he began a more agressive promotion for this=20 technology.  Soon, Dick Chapin formed Watermatics which began=20 manufacturing small diameter plastic tubes and longer thinned = walled pipes=20 mad from thin plastic sheets.  Soon, bi-wall drip tubes were = available that=20 permitted longer lateral lines with acceptable flow variations along the = lines.  Bernarr J. Hall, another San Diego Farm advisor who worked = with=20 Gustafson, further expanded the Southern California drip/trickle work on = vegetables."
 
"In 1973, many Americans attended the first = International Drip=20 Irrigation Congress in Tel Aviv, Israel.  The second congress was=20 immediately planned for 1974 in San Diego, = CA......"  
 
"Drip/trickle irrigation was ideally suited to = widely spaced=20 plant crops like orchards or vineyards with the more traditional fixed = emitters=20 on small diameter polyethylene laterals.  The drip/trickle = tube=20 products (now called tapes)  were well suited to haigh valued = vegetable=20 crops, and even large-scale agricultural crops like sugarcane.  But = the=20 heart of any sucessful drip/trickle system was the water filtration=20 system.  Screen filters were adapted alon with media filters to = reduce=20 emitter and tape clogging from fine particles"  (Are you taking = notes fish=20 farmers?- TGTX)
 
"In some cases, water treatment with chlorine and/or = acids was=20 necessary to reduce lime formation and biological clogging.  = Drip/trickle=20 irrigation soon invaded the commercial, home, and garden irrigation = markets=20 together with the greenhouse industry, where Dr. Blass started his work" = (Full=20 circle, I like it.- TGTX)
 
"The drip/trickle concept was applied to low-volume = sprays by=20 James Roberts, a San Marcos, CA citrus grower.  These devices and = other=20 low-volume sprayers continued to evolve.  Soon it became nearly = impossible=20 to classify all the differing types of low-volume applicators.  = Now, we=20 simply "lump" all these low-volume applicators whether drip, trickle,=20 microsprays, spitters, etc. under the single name=20 "microirrigation""
 
"Although overall irrigated land area has not = changed=20 substantially during the past two decades, rather dramatic changes have = occurred=20 in on-farm irrigation methods.  Surface irrigation remains vitally=20 important to U.S. agriculture, but it declined from 62% of irrigated = lands in=20 1979 to 50% in 1998.  During this time center pivots increased by = 72% and=20 microirrigaton by almost 600%.  Irrigation has evolved into a = high-tech=20 industry filled with people on the verge of the latest technological=20 advances.  It is without a doubt that those within the industry = will=20 continue to move it forward in the new millenium"
 
The article also refers readers to a complete = history of=20 irrigation found in the book "Water and the Land" by Robert M. = Morgan. =20
 
Ted
------=_NextPart_000_0028_01BF7ACB.2F966B40-- .------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------. | Message 6 | '------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------' Subject: Re: History of Irrigation From: "TGTX" Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 12:07:17 -0600 A thousand apologies, Mimsab Paula Barry just informed me that I sent that last message in HTML. I thought I had this problem fixed some time ago. Please let me know if it comes back again. Maybe somebody else around this house is changing the options in my email software every so often. So just delete that last post in HTML. The following is in plain text...at least that is what my computer tells me... ----- Original Message ----- From: TGTX To: aquaponics@townsqr.com Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2000 11:19 AM Subject: History of Irrigation According to the 1999 Irrigation Survey in the Jan/Feb 2000 issue of Irrigation Journal, 6,459,000 acres were irrigated in Texas alone. (62,967,484 acres in the U.S.A. altogether). Sandra Postel's book "Pillar of Sand: Can the Irrigation Miracle Last" claims that innovative irrigation technologies and strategies can alleviate hunger and environmental stress at the same time and that we can protect river and vital ecosystems evan as we aim to produce enough food for a projected 8 billion people on this third rock from the sun by the year 2030. I noted in the Texas data from that survey that 4,050,000 acres of the 6,459,000 were irrigated by sprinkler systems, which have an approximate annual efficiency of 78%, whereas only 64,000 acres were in Surface Drip-Trickle or Subsurface Drip-Trickle irrigation, (other wise known as microirrigation) which has about a 90% or so annual efficiency rating. Being a cheerleader for change and an advocate of greater efficiency with respect to resource management and feeding those folks in 2030, I would like to focus on this vis a vis aquaponics. Since, in aquaponics, we are irrigating our crops..or perhaps "fertigating" might be a better word, and since Michael in his earlier brought back this stirring feeling I have had to go and see the miraculous and magnificent irrigated fields of Israel, (Israel has become one of the top fruit producers for European markets, I have heard) I thought the group might be interested in, or at least entertained by, a history of microirrigation in the open fields...It might spawn discussions on how we can integrate large aquaculture systems with large open field crop systems by "fertigating" with aquaculture water periodically or continuously. The University of Arizona Environmental Research Laboratory has done some studies along these lines. I have some of those papers lying around here somewhere. Here are some interesting quotes from the article "Drops of Life in the History of Irrigation" written by Dr. Terry A. Howell in that same issue of the Irrigation Journal, (see http:/www.irrigationjournal.com): (Dr. Howell is a Research Leader and a Supervisory Agricultural Engineer with the USDA-Agricultural Research Service (ARS) in Bushland, TX.) "Microirrigation, an entirely new irrigation application technology evolved in the 1960s and 1970s, although some documented concepts of it date back to 1917. As plastic materials became widely used in agriculture following WWII, an Israeli engineer working in England named Dr. Symcha Blass developed the technology to irrigate greenhouse plants. In the 1950s, he took this technology back to the Negev desert in Israel to produce crops even with highly saline waters. A San Diego County Farm Advisor in California, C. Don Gustafson, and a San Diego sprinkler manufacturer, Bruce Brown, observed Blass' work in Israel and returned to apply it to avocadoes in Southern California in the late 1960s. Brown formed the Drip-Eze Company. This application technology was called drip, because of the water dripped from fixed emitters, or trickle because of smaller streams from microtubes." "The row crop, or vegetable side of drip/trickle irrigation is often traced to Norm Smith who was working with farmers in New York with new plastic products that had become available. Later when Smith moved to Rutgers University, he began a more agressive promotion for this technology. Soon, Dick Chapin formed Watermatics which began manufacturing small diameter plastic tubes and longer thinned walled pipes mad from thin plastic sheets. Soon, bi-wall drip tubes were available that permitted longer lateral lines with acceptable flow variations along the lines. Bernarr J. Hall, another San Diego Farm advisor who worked with Gustafson, further expanded the Southern California drip/trickle work on vegetables." "In 1973, many Americans attended the first International Drip Irrigation Congress in Tel Aviv, Israel. The second congress was immediately planned for 1974 in San Diego, CA......" "Drip/trickle irrigation was ideally suited to widely spaced plant crops like orchards or vineyards with the more traditional fixed emitters on small diameter polyethylene laterals. The drip/trickle tube products (now called tapes) were well suited to haigh valued vegetable crops, and even large-scale agricultural crops like sugarcane. But the heart of any sucessful drip/trickle system was the water filtration system. Screen filters were adapted alon with media filters to reduce emitter and tape clogging from fine particles" (Are you taking notes fish farmers?- TGTX) "In some cases, water treatment with chlorine and/or acids was necessary to reduce lime formation and biological clogging. Drip/trickle irrigation soon invaded the commercial, home, and garden irrigation markets together with the greenhouse industry, where Dr. Blass started his work" (Full circle, I like it.- TGTX) "The drip/trickle concept was applied to low-volume sprays by James Roberts, a San Marcos, CA citrus grower. These devices and other low-volume sprayers continued to evolve. Soon it became nearly impossible to classify all the differing types of low-volume applicators. Now, we simply "lump" all these low-volume applicators whether drip, trickle, microsprays, spitters, etc. under the single name "microirrigation"" "Although overall irrigated land area has not changed substantially during the past two decades, rather dramatic changes have occurred in on-farm irrigation methods. Surface irrigation remains vitally important to U.S. agriculture, but it declined from 62% of irrigated lands in 1979 to 50% in 1998. During this time center pivots increased by 72% and microirrigaton by almost 600%. Irrigation has evolved into a high-tech industry filled with people on the verge of the latest technological advances. It is without a doubt that those within the industry will continue to move it forward in the new millenium" The article also refers readers to a complete history of irrigation found in the book "Water and the Land" by Robert M. Morgan. Ted .------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------. | Message 7 | '------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------' Subject: Re: UV mysteries From: Marcy Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 12:09:33 -0700 I am editing my mailbox and ran across your message. Sorry it took me so long to answer but I am totally stretched beyond having any fun. Hope you understand I was not trying to ignore you. I even respond to most hate mail. We are organizing a farmers market, setting up buisiness with some chef association Marcy is involved with, etc. etc. Oh, and as time permits we do farming. We paid US $.055 per square foot for the first greenhouse covering we got toward the end of last summer. The latest stuff we got for US $.057 per square foot and the salesman said he got in trouble cause he should have charged us US $.057 per square foot for the first covering we bought. Both covers were 6 mil UV treated non pvc compatible and a US $.01 per sq/ft charge for shipping. The company was Eason Horticultural Resources based in Kentucky. Marcy just told me they get it from GreenTek out of Wisconsin. For technical data do not bother with their sales staff as they do not know what they are talking about when it comes to issues of materials compatibility and such. Three times the sales staff tried to BS their way through our questions and we had a different story from their tech people when we finally got through to them each time. In other words we never got completely accurate info from their sales staff. Even the pricing we got was messed up so please get names, numbers, dates and times of who and what you talk about. Customer service wise they were friendly and tried to be helpful. The product was shipped promptly and arrived here by Roadway truck line, a mainstream truck line, in good shape and packed well. They do have real tech people who seem to know what is going on and we got answers from them within 48 hours and they were customer friendly. Hope this helps and happy greens to you too, Marc michael kent barnett wrote: > > > As time permits I will post pictures but we are so darn busy > > now that the greenhouse stuff is underway. > > > > Regards, > > Marc > > Marc could you please post me some info too on the UV plastic you > recieved..? I would be most appreciative.. any contact info would be > ok... or at least the pricing...?! > > Keep smiling... and good growing.. > Mike .------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------. | Message 8 | '------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------' Subject: Re: History of Irrigation From: Marcy and Marc Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 12:32:14 -0700 TGTX wrote: > ..snip.. > Since, in aquaponics, we are irrigating our crops..or perhaps "fertigating" > might be a better word, and ..snip.. Marcy is studying various emitter technology for our garden enterprise(s). T-Tape is the leading contender as of this writing. The discard waste aquaponics water will be used as a portion of the feed. Marc .------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------. | Message 9 | '------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------' Subject: Re: History of Irrigation From: "TGTX" Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 13:53:24 -0600 > Marcy is studying various emitter technology for our garden > enterprise(s). T-Tape is the leading contender as of this > writing. Yeah, Marc, T-tape was my choice too. As I remember, It emits at 0.48 gallons per minute per 100 foot. Does that sound right? Ted .------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------. | Message 10 | '------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------' Subject: Re: History of Irrigation From: Marcy and Marc Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 15:53:34 -0700 That would be the following: Models TSX 5XX-42-480 with emitter spacing of 42 inches TSX 7xx-42-480 with emitter spacing of 42 inches Operating at 0% slope and 8 PSI inlet pressure. Marc TGTX wrote: > > > Marcy is studying various emitter technology for our garden > > enterprise(s). T-Tape is the leading contender as of this > > writing. > > Yeah, Marc, T-tape was my choice too. As I remember, It emits at 0.48 > gallons per minute per 100 foot. Does that sound right? > > Ted
Back to Index