Aquaponics Digest - Sat 01/30/99




Message   1: Crop King

             from "KevinLReed" 

Message   2: aerobic oxygen

             from "Jorg D. Ostrowski" 

Message   3: water storage

             from William Evans 

Message   4: Grass clippings

             from "KevinLReed" 

Message   5: Re: aquaponic swimming pool: chlorine

             from "KevinLReed" 

Message   6: Re: Crop King

             from Hydro/Aquatic Tech 

Message   7: Re: aerobic oxygen

             from doelle 

Message   8: Aerobic Oxygen Experiment

             from Michael Strates 

Message   9: Re: Stupid Question

             from Michael Strates 

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 1                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Crop King

From:    "KevinLReed" 

Date:    Fri, 29 Jan 1999 23:04:19 -0800

Hi All,

I have seen someinformation on Crop King Greenhouses and NFT systems.

I had a few questions that someone in group may be able to answer.

First has anyone had experience with Crop King Greenhouses, if so what do

you think of thier products.

Second do you think it may be possible to use the S&S ebb and flow nodes

along with a connected NFT system. Plants with needs for higher nutrient

levels could grown in the conventional S&S node. The water before being

returned to the fish tank would first run through the NFT system for lettuce

or plants wth lower nutrient needs. It seems that if the total square feet

of growing area are kept in the proper ration to the cubic feet of the fish

tanks. I am wondering if the additional aeration of roots in the NFT part of

system could be balanced with the more cost effective closed loop S&S grow

bed node.

I am interested in your thoughts.

Kevin

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 2                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: aerobic oxygen

From:    "Jorg D. Ostrowski" 

Date:    Sat, 30 Jan 1999 07:04:00 -0700 (MST)

Horst: Further to your message of below, my literature says:

"aerobic oxygen kills all anaerobic (infectious) bacteria while leaving

untouched bacteria that is harmless/good for you" for "long term storage

of drinking water".

Have you or anyone actually used aerobic oxygen and has there been any

application research done on this? Which is true, the above or below?

My interest is to treat stagnant greywater without mechanical means.

Jorg Ostrowski

______________________________________________________________________

Pure oxygen is poisonous to the bacteria. Certainly anaerobes will not

grow, 

but you are also in danger of killing all aerobes and thus finish up with

a 

somewhat sterile compost heap.

Aeration is much better, as air is, of course, not pure oxygen and thus

can be 

tolerated by some facultative anaerobes and certainly by aerobes.

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 3                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: water storage

From:    William Evans 

Date:    Sat, 30 Jan 1999 06:34:35 -0800

I believe Mollison recommends limstone in the storage tank.Not in

powdered form but solid, or limit diffusion w/ paper barrier I know that

powdered limestone will aggregate/solidify again if wet and then allowed

to dry.And maybe a couple of "silver" dollars dropped in as well for

good luck.

billevans

> My interest is to treat stagnant greywater without mechanical means.

>

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 4                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Grass clippings

From:    "KevinLReed" 

Date:    Sat, 30 Jan 1999 11:42:03 -0800

Hello All,

In Southern California we have an unlimited supply of grass clippings and

other free composting material easily available. We have been using our

mostly in large barrel composters with a geared crank on the side to cycle

this material. These type of composters work very quickly so we always have

good material for the outdoor gardens.

I wonder if this could be the basis for feeding our fish and hence the

aquaponic node.

I have a few lawn areas that can be planted with grasses that are high

relatively high in nutrient content ( some of these can even be sold live to

local pet stores for small animal nutrient supplements).

Is it more efficient to feed the fish the grasses, either as grass/pasta

pellets or plain, or is it better to compost and vermiculture to use worm

castings and composted material?

Once again I am interested in your thoughts.

Kevin

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 5                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: aquaponic swimming pool: chlorine

From:    "KevinLReed" 

Date:    Sat, 30 Jan 1999 11:54:30 -0800

I moved into a house that had a very green and growing swimming pool when I

was about 19 years old. The Vector Control agency had spotted the pool

already I guess so when we moved in they had already done thier little

helicopter drop of mosquito fish into the pool ( little guppy looking guys).

We cleaned up the pool but just left them in when we refilled it and after a

subsequnt party we found that serveral oscars from the indoor fish tank were

now also in the pool. We left the oscars in too. The upshot was that we did

go a little light on the clorine and acid but enough to keep the pool clear

and all of these fish thrived ... they were still getting bigger and the

mosquito fish were still breeding though the oscars never did and since

there were only 3 they may not have been male/female mix.

Kevin

-----Original Message-----

From: Michael Strates 

To: aquaponics@townsqr.com 

Date: Thursday, January 28, 1999 12:18 PM

Subject: Re: aquaponic swimming pool

>On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, jilli and lars wrote:

>

>jal> chlorine, but obviously not as dangerous to _all_ living things.

>jal> I've been thinking about integrating salt water into a larger

>

>--

>

>

>

>

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 6                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Crop King

From:    Hydro/Aquatic Tech 

Date:    Sat, 30 Jan 1999 16:26:17 -0800

> Hi All,

> I have seen someinformation on Crop King Greenhouses and NFT systems.

> I had a few questions that someone in group may be able to answer.

> First has anyone had experience with Crop King Greenhouses, if so what do

> you think of thier products.

I've spent several weeks last year in CropKing greenhouses at the

CropKing headquarters in Medina Ohio while designing/installing several

prototype aquaponic and aquaculture systems for them.  The structures

are well designed and durable, though not as technologically innovative

as some of the newer models put out by Jaderloon and Rough Brothers (but

not

as expensive as Jaderloon or RB either.)  CropKing specializes in

double poly (soft skinned) greenhouses, they don't handle the

polycarbonate structured sheet (PSS) hard-shell houses except on special

order.  They also have a separate division (ShelterKing) that handles a

greenhouse framed structure that uses opaque covers similar to VERY

heavy duty tarps rather than transparent plastic that are ideal for low

cost aquaculture operations.  

A double bay greenhouse frame with one bay covered with poly and the

other bay covered with the tarp material would be ideal for aquaponics. 

Run the plants in the natural light of the greenhouse glazed side, run

the fish in the covered side to reduce algae growth and get better

thermal savings.  With a split system like this (and a dividing wall

between the two halves) you can run the plants at THEIR desired

temperatures and humidity, while optimizing the temperature and humidity

for the fish in THEIR half.

Scott Jones

Hydro/Aquatic Technologies

Aquaponic consultants and suppliers

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 7                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: aerobic oxygen

From:    doelle 

Date:    Sun, 31 Jan 1999 09:07:30 +1100

>Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 09:06:24 +1100

>To: "Jorg D. Ostrowski" <

>From: doelle <

>Subject: Re: aerobic oxygen

>In-Reply-To: <

>References: <<3.0.1.32.19990130141737.006dce14@ozemail.com.au>

>

>Jorg, Very often one mixes up aeration and the need opf the aerobic

bacteria for oxygen. You will never find anybody using 'pure oxygen' to grow

microorganisms. Oxygen is always mixed with nitrogen or one uses 'aeration'

which means air.

>The reason for the poisonous effect are the oxygen radicals in pure oxygen,

which work like ozone or worse. I could give you a whole lecture on this use

with the special enzymes required to tolerate oxygen etc etc, but that is

not what you want.

>Just remember: Aeration or aerobic metabolism is the use of air in the

medium, from which the organism takes the oxygen for its metabolism. In such

mixtures there are no oxygen radicals.

>I hope I was able to explain the difference between air and oxygen use for

microbial growth.

>If you have any further question, please ask.

>Why don't you pump air into the compost, which is cheaper and possibly much

more effective for your purpose.

>Best regards

>Horst

>At 07:04 AM 30/01/99 -0700, you wrote:

>>

>>Horst: Further to your message of below, my literature says:

>>"aerobic oxygen kills all anaerobic (infectious) bacteria while leaving

>>untouched bacteria that is harmless/good for you" for "long term storage

>>of drinking water".

>>

>>Have you or anyone actually used aerobic oxygen and has there been any

>>application research done on this? Which is true, the above or below?

>>

>>My interest is to treat stagnant greywater without mechanical means.

>>Jorg Ostrowski

>>______________________________________________________________________

>>Pure oxygen is poisonous to the bacteria. Certainly anaerobes will not

>>grow, 

>>but you are also in danger of killing all aerobes and thus finish up with

>>a 

>>somewhat sterile compost heap.

>>Aeration is much better, as air is, of course, not pure oxygen and thus

>>can be 

>>tolerated by some facultative anaerobes and certainly by aerobes.

>>

>>

>>

Horst W.Doelle, D.Sc., D.Sc. [h.c.]

Chairman, IOBB

Director, MIRCEN-Biotechnology

FAX: +617-38783230

Email: doelle@ozemail.com.au

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 8                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Aerobic Oxygen Experiment

From:    Michael Strates 

Date:    Mon, 1 Feb 1999 01:06:41 +1100 (EST)

Okay,

I have 100ml of chlorine dioxide (aerobic oxygen), and eight plates. Plate

one will be innoculated with fecal coliform bacteria, two with e.coli

(humanure strain), three with anerobic digester "starter" fluid, and the

forth with aerobic compost starter liquid.

The second set of four plates will be left untouched, while the first set

of plates will be innoculated each with 10ml of chlorine dioxide.

I also have six tanks of gambusia (mosquito fish), and each will be

inncoulated with varying amounts of calcium hypochlorite, chlorine

dioxide and hydrogen peroxide to determine a LD for gambusia.

I hope to have some definite information on how much of these chemicals

may be added to the water before death of the fish results.

As for wasting fish - I have several THOUSAND gambusia in a pond.

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 9                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Stupid Question

From:    Michael Strates 

Date:    Mon, 1 Feb 1999 01:28:29 +1100 (EST)

On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, doelle wrote:

d> Aeration is much better, as air is, of course, not pure oxygen and

d> thus can be tolerated by some facultative anaerobes and certainly by

d> aerobes.

I'm after the most optimimum level for formation of lots of heat. Anybody

know the optimum level of O2 for aerobes (not to heavy, not too light :)..

I was thinking of trying around 35%.. anybody know the upper limit?



Back to Index